Oct 09

I just read an article written a few years ago about Deep Throat finally making it, uncut, past the British film censorship board. It’s all a lot of blah blah, except for a pretty funny quote from a British film critic for the Guardian (presumably a British news organ of some kind: “It certainly doesn’t have the artistic merit of The Devil And Miss Jones or Behind The Green Door…in fact, unless you enjoy watching fellatio, it’s really rather boring.”

Well, point taken, because yes, it is kind of boring, at least by today’s standards, but seriously. “Unless you enjoy watching fellatio”? Why else would you watch Deep Throat? That’s like saying “unless you enjoy watching cars go in a circle, the Indianapolis 500 is rather boring.”


Related Posts:
Hot Latin Trannies #3Hot Latin Trannies #3But will it give you a rusty trombone?
Aug 17

Remember your first porn movie? My friend the Colonel does. Back when we were in high school, he found it on the street in our neighborhood, and man, we watched that thing nearly to death. Twenty years ago, though. He got in touch again recently, and when he found out I was in the business, he asked if I could help him find it. He knew one of the stars - Bridgette Monet - and I remembered Pat Manning, and we remembered a couple of details from the movie, and that made it pretty easy to track down. It’s called Let’s Talk Sex, and I’m pretty sure we both picked up a copy. Looking back on it, watching the scene with Pat Manning and Kevin James, I think this might be where I picked up my obsession with short-haired porn stars. It’s kind of a cheesy scene, but it worked on me when I was seventeen.


Related Posts:
Girls From Brazil In Giving an AuditionGirls From Brazil In Giving an AuditionAlways a dollar for a fellow pirate
Copyright © 2007 2257 Listing of Prior Art [R-5] - 2200 Citation of Prior Art and Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents 2257 Listing of Prior Art [R-5] The examiner must list on a form PTO-892, if not already listed on a form ** PTO/SB/08A or 08B, or PTO/SB/42 (or on a form having a format equivalent to one of these forms), all prior art patents or printed publications which have been properly cited and relied upon by the reexamination requester in the request under 37 CFR 1.510. The examiner must also list on a form PTO-892, if not already listed on a form ** PTO/SB/08A or 08B, or PTO/SB/42 (or on a form having a format equivalent to one of these forms), all prior art patents or printed publications which have been cited in the decision on the request, applied in making rejections or cited as being pertinent during the reexamination proceedings. Such prior art patents or printed publications may have come to the examiner's attention because: (A) they were of record in the patent file due to a prior art submission under 37 CFR 1.501 which was received prior to the date of the order; (B) they were of record in the patent file as result of earlier examination proceedings; or (C) they were discovered by the examiner during a prior art search. All citations listed on form PTO-892, and all citations not lined-through on any form ** PTO/SB/08A or 08B, or PTO/SB/42 (or on a form having a format equivalent to one of these forms), will be printed on the reexamination certificate under "References Cited." A submission of patents and/or publications is entitled to entry and citation in the reexamination certificate (that will be issued) when it complies with 37 CFR 1.98 and is submitted: (A) by the patent owner in the statement under 37 CFR 1.530; (B) by the reexamination requester in the reply under 37 CFR 1.535; (C) prior to the order of reexamination under 37 CFR 1.501 by any party; and/or (D) by the patent owner under the duty of disclosure requirements of 37 CFR 1.555.